Right to health care: Introduction
The question of a "right" to health care has obsessed my mind for the last several months. Unlike most ideas, which tend to pop in and out, this one has stuck with me, which means I should address it here.
First consideration: Why has this particular question stuck with me? Because, I think, it is the crux of the matter of whether and how universal health care (UHC) should be made available. If there is no "right" to health care, then it is much more difficult for supporters to argue that UHC is in the best interests of the U.S.
Thus I am starting a series on health care rights. If you have an opinion, yea or nay, on UHC, share it in a comment or e-mail me (address in my profile, linked to in the sidebar) if you are interested in a guest post.
Don't miss a post in this series on health care rights! Subscribe now.
del.icio.us
Comments by IntenseDebate
Posting anonymously.
Related Posts
- Right to health care: One working definition
- Right to health care: What is "basic" health care?
- Right to health care: What is an encumbrance?
- Are parents selfish if they have a big family?
- Embryonic stem cells declared probably defunct — on Oprah
- The human dignity of anencephalic babies
- Natural infertility treatments v. the IVF band-aid
- Not vaccinating? Your child could die
- Is Dr. House a realistic doctor?