May
31
Are parents selfish if they have a big family?
Posted by
Ginkgo100
Labels:
blogs,
catholic life,
clarifying the record,
culture,
ethics,
explanations,
faith,
family,
opinions
Why do people think it's selfish to have lots of kids?
Recently there was a bit of a dust-up in the combox at my sister's blog, Mama Says*, in which one commenter in particular charged that only selfish parents have big families. Having lots of kids (eight, in this case) allegedly is harmful to the older children in the family.
This is a mainstream attitude in modern American culture. Big families are viewed with scorn and derision, the parents accused of being selfish because either (a) they are dividing their love and attention among too many kids, (b) they are contributing to overpopulation, (c) they are using more than their share of natural resources, or (d) all of the above.
As a cradle Catholic, I have known a lot of big families. I even grew up in one, as the oldest of a brood of eight. But I have yet to meet a big family with selfish parents who are focused on fulfilling their own desires at the expense of either their family or our larger society.
I think this attitude stems from the discomfort people feel when they see large families. They cannot imagine themselves having a baseball team's worth of children, so they feel subconsciously threatened when they see one. That statement is not intended to be judgmental; it's human nature, and everyone experiences feelings like that when confronted with behavior that falls outside of social norms.
Why it is not selfish to have a big family
Let me present a picture of a typical big family. This fictional family has two parents and a startling number of kids. They have a strong religious faith, perhaps Catholic or Mormon or Evangelical. The parents at times feel overwhelmed by the sheer number of people underfoot. They know they could easily take steps to prevent themselves from having so many children, but they don't, because they have decided to trust God. They see each kid as a gift and have faith that God will provide for the kids he gave them. This is not a decision made lightly. This is radical, and they know it.
All the members of the family make a lot of sacrifices in order to follow this path. Maybe the kids aren't in as many organized activities, sports, and lessons as most of their peers. Maybe they go to restaurants less often, take fewer vacations, and share bedrooms. Maybe the younger kids rarely see a new article of clothing, being clad instead in hand-me-downs.
But they also have a lot of privileges that their peers will never know. They are never lonely. Their house is the neighborhood social hub for the 18-and-under set. They probably have a groupie or two, lonely children with no siblings whose parents work all day. They have a precocious understanding of the important things in life, like love and sharing. The older ones help their parents and learn child-care skills. They all learn practical life skills by doing chores, such as how to do laundry. They see what it is like to really live according to one's ideals and values.
They never have to hear their parents say that children are burdens, or that they are "so glad" they're done having kids.
And above all, they never, ever feel unloved. Big families like to repeat the saying that "love doesn't divide, it multiplies." It's more than a cute saying, it's literally true: the kids all love each other. Each new baby has a live-in fan club. Each older child has a crowd of younger devotees who think he is the coolest person on the planet.
The truth is, every parent of a crowd has no choice but to give of the deepest part of themselves, every single day. They are practically forced to be unselfish.
Selfish parents could not do this job.
* (cough cough) Which I helped design, by the way (ahem) not that I'm boasting or anything, but I have mad skillz don't I? Nevermind that I didn't do most of the work.
Comments (13)

Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity
Loading comments...
Comments by IntenseDebate
Posting anonymously.
Are parents selfish if they have a big family?
2009-05-31T10:57:00-05:00
Ginkgo100
blogs|catholic life|clarifying the record|culture|ethics|explanations|faith|family|opinions|
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Related Posts
- 7 Quick Takes 2: Scientist Christians, a blessed Mythbusters event, and more
- An argument for celibate priests
- Tom Hanks, clueless about Angels & Demons controversy
- Women's Health and Other Shameful Women's Magazines
- Embryonic stem cells declared probably defunct — on Oprah
- The human dignity of anencephalic babies
- Four depression myths
- Four anxiety myths
- Readings for the first Sunday of Lent: Noah, the Flood, and baptism
- Not vaccinating? Your child could die
- Natural infertility treatments v. the IVF band-aid
- Are parents selfish if they have a big family?
SarahP 12p · 826 weeks ago
It's very sad and pathetic.
By the way, I love the fact that you said you helped design your sisters blog. Nothing is wrong with that. In fact, my sisters current blog header was designed by me.
Kaira · 826 weeks ago
Alison · 826 weeks ago
Marie · 826 weeks ago
Marie · 826 weeks ago
Renee · 826 weeks ago
Children are great, children should be loved, children are special to their parents, but that doesn't mean they are entitled to 'narcissistic princess epidemic' that they should be pampered and served as if they are they only ones that exist in on the planet. If not having a lot of siblings (like myself), even a greater extended family close byserves this function of giving the gift of humility, that there is a world beyond 'me'.
tia · 826 weeks ago
Each family is different. Milehi had her children as they came, and it's not like her eldest came out of the womb wearing a sign "I have special needs". I don't know the history, but I am sure at least several of those children came along well before the diagnosis of her eldest child. As for her two year old - communication issues are rather typical, and not just among those in large families and not just among those with special needs older siblings. They are not really special needs beyond needing a little extra help. My own nephew, the second of only two children, was speech delayed and had extra help and training until Kindergarten. Now, at age 8, he is nothing more or less than a "normal" kid.
Don't judge others on your very narrow view, experience or knowledge. You know absolutely nothing of the mother - and woman - you are going up against. You are a very narrow minded person with strong conviction, apparently. The problem with that is that you are convicted on something you have no knowledge of and that is a dangerous path to travel.
Sheila · 825 weeks ago
I can't believe Susan things that having more children around is a negative for children with special needs! One of my best friends just had a baby with special needs, and the doctors at DUKE all recommended that they have MULTIPLE children-- they said it would be BEST for the child with special needs!
And I attended Bob Jones University, where there are tons of home schooled students. Guess what? They're some of the best students around! My little sister's best friend from high school was home schooled until 9th grade-- with 5 other siblings. They're all bright kids, ATTENDING COLLEGE. Including Virginia Tech!
And it's great for children to grow up around children with special needs-- it gives them a broader knowledge and life experience. I've known several people that grew up with siblings that have special needs... and they went on to specialize in... you guessed it! Special Needs stuff!!
Ginkgo100 38p · 825 weeks ago
This is not a personal blog. This blog views issues from a general perspective. That is why this post does not discuss any specific family.
Without discussing any particular family with special needs kids, I think something needs to be clarified. "Special needs" is just a label. A child is not defined by having so-called "special needs." The labels exist to make it easier to find the specific treatment that will benefit that child. But for the most part, they are just kids, normal kids in most ways. They aren't another species, monsters, or a reason to sacrifice the other aspects of life. The needs of each one have to be taken into consideration—but this is true for all children, whether or not they have a "label."
Thanks for your comments! I read them all.
Wosie · 825 weeks ago
A quick note to any Christian or Mormon reading this - do you really think that any parent, including MHM and her husband, would be given children who were a bigger challenge than he or she would be able to handle?
Sheila · 825 weeks ago
So glad that you included the part about labels!! I know I definitely generalized in my comment :) Also, yes "they are just kids, normal kids in most ways." And most kids benefit from a little extra love, especially in the form of siblings!
Celia · 825 weeks ago
marjorie Conder · 823 weeks ago
Grandma