Jul
04
Magical thinking in religion
Posted by
Ginkgo100
Labels:
apologetics,
catholic belief,
clarifying the record,
magic,
psychology,
sacraments,
science,
superstition
Science writer Brian Clegg recently wrote in his blog* that religious thinking is often "magical" thinking. He gave several examples from the Judeo-Christian tradition, including this one from the Church of England:
I would suggest that those in the Church of England who don’t want women bishops are motivated by magic. Their argument is that it has always been that way, that Jesus only chose male apostles, and that bishops sort of stand in for Jesus, so have to be male, as he was.Clegg is a science writer, and quite a good one, but his expertise does not extend to Christian theology. His example above confuses magical thinking with sacramental thinking.
Magical thinking is "nonscientific causal reasoning" that follows certain rules, a bit analogous to scientific laws. Like scientific laws, magical thinking does not identify these rules as arising from any particular source; they just are. Superstitions arise from magical thinking.
Christianity — particularly Catholic Christianity and those Protestant traditions most akin to Catholicism — is deeply imbued with sacramental thinking. In a sacrament, there is an outward, visible symbol of a supernatural reality. In the case of ordination, the supernatural reality is that deacons, priests, and bishops are marked with a supernatural character that gives them the ability to "stand in" for Christ. The outward symbol includes the necessity that the ordained be similar to Christ in the most fundamental way: they must be male. (I think it's interesting that the Church of England is hung-up on female bishops, since it already allows female deacons and priests — doesn't it make sense that God would require male gender for either all ordinations or for none?)
Unlike magical thinking, the associations found in sacramental theology are attributed to a specific and personal source — God. Male gender is not necessary because of our limited perceptions and understanding, nor because of some great cosmic "should"; it is necessary because God made it so.
* Do not, by any means, miss the first comment to Clegg's post! It will make your day.
Comments (4)

Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity
Loading comments...
Comments by IntenseDebate
Posting anonymously.
Magical thinking in religion
2008-07-04T09:19:00-05:00
Ginkgo100
apologetics|catholic belief|clarifying the record|magic|psychology|sacraments|science|superstition|
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Related Posts
- Are parents selfish if they have a big family?
- Tom Hanks, clueless about Angels & Demons controversy
- Gardasil, poison, and vaccine reactions
- Top 5 Conspiracies... of Science!
- Top 10 facts you never knew about New Age beings
- Women's Health and Other Shameful Women's Magazines
- Free Videos About Depression and Anxiety
- Anxiety and depression resources
- PZ Myers, the merry desecrator
- Top Three questions about the Eucharist you never asked
- Magical thinking in religion
- Dog breeds as different species, and observing evolution
- More about stem cells
- Magical thinking and superstition
- Jesus is an elephant
- Readings for the first Sunday of Lent: Noah, the Flood, and baptism
- Is religion rational? What John C. Wright says
- 7 Quick Takes 2: Scientist Christians, a blessed Mythbusters event, and more
- An argument for celibate priests
- Natural infertility treatments v. the IVF band-aid
knit_tgz 1p · 873 weeks ago
Ginkgo100 38p · 873 weeks ago
DarwinCatholic · 872 weeks ago
Ordaining female bishops opens up problems of apostolic succession, especially since the CofE refused to make sure that separate lines of apostolic succession were maintained in which no women were involved.
I must say, as a Catholic, the whole thing seems really, really weird to me, since it involves some members of the Church not thinking that the sacraments celebrated by other members are valid.
VATRegistration 24p · 547 weeks ago