Welcome! This site exists to help shed light on the topics of science and Catholic faith. Please introduce yourself here!

If you would like to subscribe to this blog, click here. To receive new posts by e-mail, enter your e-mail address below. Your e-mail is always kept private.


Delivered by FeedBurner
Apr
14

Animal welfare and the Catholic Church

Labels: , ,

One area of Catholic theology that seems underdeveloped is a clear explanation of our moral obligations towards animals.

Certainly, it is not inappropriate for this subject to be underdeveloped. The Church's thinkers have explored theology according to a heirarchy of importance. The nature of Christ and his sacrifice came first, as the various Christological heresies (Arianism, Monophysitism, etc.) were rejected. Then the nature of the Trinity was explored. Next came the rejection of the various Protestant heresies and explanations of many of the sacraments. In modern times, the sacrament of marriage and the issues surrounding the beginning of life have been explored by John Paul the Great in his Theology of the Body.

This very crude overview leaves out a great deal, but it makes the point that the field of theology has started with the most important things and proceeded to subjects of lesser and lesser importance.

Humanity's moral obligations toward animals, and the nature of the relationship between God and animals — in short, a theology of animals — is near the bottom of the ladder of importance. I believe that the need to develop this area is becoming more pressing because of the increasing prominence of several heresies regarding animals — for example, the vegan heresy that animals are the moral equivalents of human beings — and an increasing general cultural concern for the welfare of animals.

I want to explore the Church's present teachings on animals. Over the next few weeks, I plan to make a series of posts on the theology available to us lay people so far. I am eager for comments on this series! Please "leave a light on" for this and other posts in this series.

"Animals and Catholics" image adapted from "dog & cat" by Yukari. (CC) Some rights reserved.

Comment (1)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
The vegans have a heresy that animals are the moral equivalents of human beings... some (like those in Britain who argued for infanticide for certain infants) have the same heresy from a different angle. (The vegans say we shouldn't eat a cow because we wouldn't eat a child; the others say we can kill a disabled baby because we can kill a disabled cat.)

I think the seed of a theology of animals is being developed in the Church's comments about caring for the environment, for the Earth, in general.

I think we need to stop using the word "humane" to refer to treatment of non-humans. We need a different word to describe not inflicting pointless cruelty on animals.

It would be interesting to see how a theology of animals would deal with hierarchy among animals. Is there a moral difference between squashing a bug in your house and shooting a squirrel?

Also, is it good, bad, or morally neutral for people to use pets as a sort of substitute for human interaction? For lonely people to love their pet as they would a child?

If someone is donating to charity, do they have any sort of moral obligation to try to donate to a charity that helps people instead of a charity that helps animals?

Some of these are questions that I think remain unanswered by theology to this point. And then, of course, there is the perennial "Do pets go to heaven?" question, which I have heard theologians come down firmly on both sides of.

Post a new comment

Comments by